Chapter 1: Introduction to the MPF System

MPF Intermediaries Examination · Chapter 1: Introduction to the MPF System

Q1 Free

Under the three-pillar retirement protection framework proposed by the World Bank in 1994, which pillar does the Hong Kong MPF System belong to?

  • A. Pillar One: a publicly-financed and managed social safety net
  • B. Pillar Two: a mandatory, privately-managed, fully-funded contribution scheme
  • C. Pillar Three: voluntary personal savings
  • D. Pillar Four: informal support such as family support
Show Answer

Correct Answer: B

  • According to Section 1.4 of the Study Notes, the World Bank's 1994 three-pillar framework defines Pillar Two as 'a mandatory, privately-managed, fully-funded contribution scheme.' The MPF System was designed precisely on this template and is therefore a Pillar Two system. Even after the World Bank expanded the framework to five pillars in 2005, MPF remains the second pillar.
  • Option A describes Pillar One (a publicly-financed safety net such as CSSA), which is not a contribution-based scheme like MPF. Option D refers to Pillar Four under the 2005 five-pillar framework, not the 1994 three-pillar framework referenced in the question.
Q2 Free

Mr Chan is a relevant employee earning a monthly salary of HK$6,500, which is below the minimum relevant income level. Under the MPF System, what mandatory contribution arrangement applies to him and his employer each month?

  • A. Both the employee and the employer must each contribute 5%
  • B. Neither the employee nor the employer is required to contribute
  • C. The employee is not required to contribute, but the employer must still contribute 5% of the employee's relevant income
  • D. The employee must contribute 5%, but the employer is exempt from contributing
Show Answer

Correct Answer: C

  • Per Section 1.5(b) of the Study Notes, a relevant employee earning less than the minimum relevant income level (HK$7,100/month) is not required to make mandatory contributions, but the employer must still contribute 5% of that employee's relevant income. Mr Chan's HK$6,500 salary falls below the threshold, so he is exempt from contributing while his employer must still contribute 5%.
  • Option A is wrong because the employee is exempt below the threshold. Option B is wrong because the employer's obligation does not disappear with the employee's exemption. Option D reverses the exemption direction — the policy protects low-income workers, so it is the employee (not the employer) who is exempt.

The full app is now available

More practice questions, mock exams and progress analytics.

Download on the App Store

Independent study aid. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority (MPFA) of Hong Kong.

© 2026 Sai Chun Christopher Tang. All rights reserved.