第5部份:MPF 計劃及投資
MPF Intermediaries Examination · Chapter 5: MPF Schemes and Investment
Q1 免費 Free
關於強積金計劃、成分基金及滙集投資基金的審批與認可,下列何者正確描述積金局與證監會的分工?
Regarding the approval and authorization of MPF schemes, constituent funds and pooled investment funds, which of the following correctly describes the division of work between the MPFA and the SFC?
顯示答案 / Show Answer
正確答案 / Correct Answer: C
- 根據 Study Notes 5.1,積金局根據強積金條例及其附屬法規負責註冊強積金計劃及審批成分基金與滙集投資基金;證監會則負責認可該等計劃及基金、審查及認可發售文件、廣告及推廣資料的披露,並發牌予投資經理。兩者職能互補。
- 選項 B 把職能對調;C 錯誤地視兩者職能相同;D 把積金局貶為投訴處理機構,與條例分工不符。
- Per Study Notes 5.1, the MPFA registers MPF schemes and approves constituent funds and pooled investment funds under the MPF Ordinance, while the SFC authorizes them and vets the disclosure in offering documents, advertisements and marketing materials, and licenses investment managers. The functions are complementary.
- Option B swaps the roles; C wrongly equates them; D mischaracterizes the MPFA as merely a complaints body.
Q2 免費 Free
《強積金投資基金守則》與《證監會強積金產品守則》的關係為何?
What is the relationship between the Code on MPF Investment Funds and the SFC Code on MPF Products?
顯示答案 / Show Answer
正確答案 / Correct Answer: C
- 根據 Study Notes 5.1(c),《強積金投資基金守則》由積金局發出,集中於運作與投資合規;《證監會強積金產品守則》由證監會發出,集中於認可程序與發售文件披露。兩部守則互為補充。
- 選項 B 把發證機構對調;B 違反互為補充原則;D 計劃類型分配並無依據。
- Per Study Notes 5.1(c), the Code on MPF Investment Funds (MPFA) focuses on operational and investment compliance, while the SFC Code on MPF Products focuses on authorization and offering document disclosure. They are complementary.
- A swaps the issuers; B contradicts the complementary nature; D's scheme-type division has no basis.
Independent study aid. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority (MPFA) of Hong Kong.
本應用為獨立學習工具,與強制性公積金計劃管理局 (MPFA) 無關,亦未獲其認可。
© 2026 Sai Chun Christopher Tang. All rights reserved.